{"id":110,"date":"2013-02-04T17:05:52","date_gmt":"2013-02-04T22:05:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/?page_id=110"},"modified":"2021-04-12T09:03:48","modified_gmt":"2021-04-12T13:03:48","slug":"ex-parte","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/?page_id=110","title":{"rendered":"Ex parte"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns are-vertically-aligned-bottom is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>You&#8217;ve doubtless heard that an <em>ex parte<\/em> proceeding is a&nbsp;less effective way to contest a third-party patent&nbsp;than District court litigation.&nbsp;&nbsp;The lack of discovery, lack of ongoing participation, and the limited grounds for invalidity can make <em>ex parte<\/em> proceedings difficult.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We like difficult.&nbsp; We&#8217;re good at it.&nbsp; For example, we won the first challenge to successfully invalidate every <em>Orange Book<\/em> listed patent on a branded drug using only <em>ex parte<\/em> post-grant proceedings.&nbsp; And we did so quickly: the patents were invalidated before pre-trial briefing was complete, rendering a trial moot.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While we like difficult work, our billing is easy: <a href=\"http:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/02\/Motion_To_Dismiss.jpg\">we offer <em>ex parte<\/em> post-grant services on an all-inclusive, fixed-fee basis.&nbsp; <\/a>For a <em>Price Quotation<\/em> for your case, <a href=\"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/?page_id=22\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\"><div class=\"_df_book df-lite\" id=\"df_735\"  _slug=\"sofia-2008-us4978680c1\" data-title=\"sofia-2008-us4978680c1\" wpoptions=\"true\" thumbtype=\"\" ><\/div><script class=\"df-shortcode-script\" nowprocket type=\"application\/javascript\">window.option_df_735 = {\"outline\":[],\"backgroundColor\":\"#d3bc9c\",\"autoEnableOutline\":\"false\",\"autoEnableThumbnail\":\"false\",\"overwritePDFOutline\":\"false\",\"enableDownload\":\"true\",\"direction\":\"1\",\"pageSize\":\"0\",\"singlePageMode\":\"2\",\"controlsPosition\":\"bottom\",\"soundEnable\":\"false\",\"autoPlay\":\"false\",\"autoPlayStart\":\"false\",\"source\":\"https:\\\/\\\/licensinglaw.net\\\/blog3\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/SOFIA-2008-US4978680C1.pdf\",\"wpOptions\":\"true\"}; if(window.DFLIP && window.DFLIP.parseBooks){window.DFLIP.parseBooks();}<\/script>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You&#8217;ve doubtless heard that an ex parte proceeding is a&nbsp;less effective way to contest a third-party patent&nbsp;than District court litigation.&nbsp;&nbsp;The lack of discovery, lack of ongoing participation, and the limited grounds for invalidity can make ex parte proceedings difficult. We like difficult.&nbsp; We&#8217;re good at it.&nbsp; For example, we won &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":19,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"template-full-width.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-110","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","column","twocol"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=110"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/110\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":814,"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/110\/revisions\/814"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/19"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/licensinglaw.net\/blog3\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}